+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Red face force war on sleeping clan

    Is there anything that can be done when a clan is attack and no one is online. My clan has been forced so many times and when we are forced nobody is online. i think something should be done. Just today i log on with only minutes for the war to be over. Its unfair. They other clan gets more win just because they attack a sleeping clan. Can there maybe be another rule were it doesn't allow u to attack unless three members are on or something. Just my thought.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to axy For This Useful Post:

    mailmeharry2008 (01-20-2011)

  3. #2
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    434
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 108 Times in 75 Posts

    Default

    I do not see anything changing in this regard.

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    495
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts

    Default

    Hey chris sir, there is one thing that can be done. Just like their is option of clan accepting members in settings of admin. You can introduce a simple system that says Other clans can enforce wars on you, YES or NO?

    What do you say about that Admin Chris Sir?

  5. #4
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    434
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 108 Times in 75 Posts

    Default

    Doing so would invalidate the concept of forced wars.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    495
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts

    Default

    Yes that's true sir, but think about it many people are mad for war, they could be grouped differently and many people prefer the peaceful aspects of game like me, so people like me could be grouped differently.

    So I think it would not invalidate the forced wars concept? Simply make it one time use button with a tooltip near it saying that it is one time use only and If you say yes, then you have the right to force wars on clans and other clans can force wars on you as well.
    For no, make a tooltip saying, that you won't be able to enforce war on anybody and noone will force wars on you. However you can do official wars.

    So this will make groupings - PEACE LOVERS AND WAR LOVERS.....

    Somewhat similar to my previous clan which i made with the same name as said above. Peace Lovers.....

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    if they are mad they shouldnt be playing a fighting game. Thats the whole idea of the game. If you get mad, retaliate. Sheesh

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    495
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts

    Thumbs up This game do have peaceful aspects as well

    Quote Originally Posted by back2eight View Post
    if they are mad they shouldnt be playing a fighting game. Thats the whole idea of the game. If you get mad, retaliate. Sheesh


    This game has the option for bossing and questing as well, alongwith chatting, pms etc. so it is very much game for simple people as well.

    That's why i said that if two factions are made then it would be great idea, back2eight and also to Chris Sir.


    With Regards
    Harinder Singh

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    WVU
    Posts
    101
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    instead of making it a permanent change to be peaceful or warlike how about a monthly thing? many clans are made solely for the purpose of helping new, lower-level people. if you choose it by month you can either participate or not in forced wars, if you want to war then people will be able to war you as well, none of that keeping 9 players with a jr on hold to stay safe. there would be no restrictions other than the 12 hour "safetime" following a war. also if you forced a war in the last week you would not be allowed to sign up for the "peaceful clan" protection. this would keep people from making a quick ambush then immediately signing the treaty for protection.

  10. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    If you did that its the same thing what would keep the clan leader from renewing the whatever you want to call it every month if something like that was to be put in place it should have a once or twice a year limit to keep people from abusing it just like they do the war pending at the moment
    Last edited by Reyalstsaeb; 03-23-2011 at 05:13 PM.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    WVU
    Posts
    101
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reyalstsaeb View Post
    If you did that its the same thing what would keep the clan leader from renewing the whatever you want to call it every month if something like that was to be put in place it should have a once or twice a year limit to keep people from abusing it just like they do the war pending at the moment
    what i had meant was that the clan leader would have the option after 30 days or so. if he had imposed a war while "open" on the 29th day it would be 7 more days before his clan could hide. if however they attacked on day 13, there would be no penalty because the ambushed clan would have ample time to retaliate anyway.

    the pending war abuse is really only abuse when a clan is hiding from retaliation. i have no problem with clans not attacking and simply trying to stay safe with the pending war loophole

    if the clan wars were to be more controled, there would certainly be fewer clans that could attack and be attacked. in order to protect the up and coming clan from being smashed mercilessly by older more mature clans there could be ranking sytems (not based on wins) to keep things more fair. this could be based off of combined point value of a clan.


 

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts