+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Same winers

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    Default

    it would b a fine system if just a certain few wouldnt b able to exploit it every week with diff alts it there was more of a randomness and limit to buy ins it would seem more fair and more people would probably b willing to put a few credits in if it had a limit to how many times u can enter and not just someone buying out the pot

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    493
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by kil9012 View Post
    it would b a fine system if just a certain few wouldnt b able to exploit it every week with diff alts it there was more of a randomness and limit to buy ins it would seem more fair and more people would probably b willing to put a few credits in if it had a limit to how many times u can enter and not just someone buying out the pot

    Fair or unfair, it is gambling. And gambling is never a fine system.

    So it should be avoided at any cost. If people themselves boycott such thing, then only unfair people (those whom you are mentioning), will put their own credits, and then win their own credits only. Those who seek fair game play should avoid such a thing just like i do.

    But greed of more and quick credits won't let people (even fair people) stay away from this sort of gambling. So they have to pay for it, by losing their hard earned credits to the unfair people, lol.
    Last edited by mailmeharry2008; 09-22-2011 at 05:45 AM.


    With Regards
    Harinder Singh


 

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts